January 1, 2012
UFO.
Two fast moving UFO'S
January 1, 2012 New sighting of Two fast moving ufos caught on video in Scotland.Recorded on a dashboard mounted camera from one of the scottish mountain rescue teams.
Earthquake.
January 2, 2012 - Christchurch hit by 17 earthquakes in 18 hours. A magnitude 4.8 earthquake has struck Christchurch, New Zealand at a depth of 13.2 km (8.2 miles), the quake hit at 05:59:14 UTC Monday 2nd January 2012
CNN Censors & Cuts Off A Veteran Who Supports Ron Paul During Interview.
Earthquake.
TWO (back to back) 7.0 magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
January 1, 2011 - Japan - There was an earthquake in Japan, it was a 7.0 magnitude on the Richter scale. Not a great way to bring in the New Year.
4.8 Magnitude Earthquake Christchurch, New Zealand
January 2, 2012 - Christchurch hit by 17 earthquakes in 18 hours. A magnitude 4.8 earthquake has struck Christchurch, New Zealand at a depth of 13.2 km (8.2 miles), the quake hit at 05:59:14 UTC Monday 2nd January 2012
The epicenter was 20 km (12.4 miles) East of Christchurch, New Zealand.
New World Order.
A New Global Economy.
PART - 1
PART -2
A New Global Economic Restructuring
January 1, 2012 - Conscious Media Network has been approached by a representative of global leaders and financiers from 130 nations to broadcast a statement about a new global economic restructuring arising in 2012.
The statement will be delivered via a video-taped interview with a layperson on behalf of the consortium that has been working behind the scenes, on the problem of the unsustainable global economy for the past 8 years. The party who drafted this statement has stated, in response to conspiracy concerns, that “The usual suspects are not the suspects” and that the Global Elite also understand that the unsecured, digital money system has failed us all, including themselves.
This announcement is to serve as the introduction of a New Global Economic Structure that will begin surfacing in 2012. Those involved in this plan are calling it the “greatest humanitarian effort” in modern history. It will be for each of us to determine over time if this is a truthful statement.
CMN is serving as a neutral party for this broadcast and what it claims, as the economic consortium does not wish to break this news through mainstream media at this time. Please give this your serious attention, as it may be heralding a new way of conducting commerce on the planet that will effect us all well into our future. It will be through our understanding and acceptance that this will happen.
A portion of this plan does include a dissolution of debt in a carefully considered and planned way. The plan itself is paradigm shattering, and only hinted at in this video-taped statement.
There will be more to come throughout the year.
January 2, 2012
Animal Death.
Thousands Of Dead Fish Wash Ashore In Trom, Norway.
By Lee Moran
January 2, 2012 - Mystery of the DEAD herring: What made 20 TONNES of fish wash up on Norwegian beach? Thousands of dead herring have been discovered washed up on a north Norwegian beach - prompting Doomsday predictors to hail it as another sign the world is set to end.
More than 20 tonnes of the fish is currently carpeting the beach of Kvaenes, in Nordreisa, with experts views differing on how they have come to be there. One thing is for sure, it will provide welcome ammunition to those believing the Mayan prophecy that 2012 will bring the end of Earth.
Jan-Petter Jorgensen, 44, was walking with his dog Molly when he found the stinky haul.
The incident in Norway is not the only mass death mystery over the New Year.
On Sunday, 200 blackbirds mysteriously fell from the sky in a small Arkansas town.
And last month 25 dead horses were discovered at the bottom of a cliff near Glenn Innes, New England.
And similarly bizarre and unexplained massacres took place on the opening days of last year, with millions of spot fish washing up in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, more blackbirds dying in Arkansas, and masses of marine life dying in a Louisiana bayou.
January 3, 2012
CNN Censors.
January 3, 2012 - Ron Paul supporter/War veteran cut off by CNN.
How convenient oldiers may go die, but speak their mind.. ohno because then the connection gets lost.
Police State.
.
January 3, 2012 - Couple Arrested For Asking Baltimore Cop To Give Them Directions
And similarly bizarre and unexplained massacres took place on the opening days of last year, with millions of spot fish washing up in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, more blackbirds dying in Arkansas, and masses of marine life dying in a Louisiana bayou.
January 6, 2012
Internet Blackout.
SOPA Ignored By Media.
January 6, 2012 - Media Matters just released a study in which the main stream media's coverage of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). Cenk Uygur breaks down the shocking results of this study.
January 11, 2012
Strange Noise.
Strange Sounds In Budapest Hungary.
January 11, 2012 - Budapest Hungary.
January 12, 2012
Strange Noise.
Strange Sounds In Conklin, Alberta.
January 12, 2012 - Conklin, Alberta.
Strange Sounds In Czech Republic.
January 12, 2012- Czech Republic.
January 17, 2012
DNA Samples.
NYC Will Take DNA Samples From all Arrested,
NOT Convicted, ARRESTED!
January 17, 2012 - If you are convicted of a violent crime in the state of New York, you are required to provide a DNA sample to authorities. This is kept on file and used by law enforcement to help identify the perpetrators of future crimes. Key to this practice is the idea that a DNA sample is taken after an individual has been found guilty.
This could soon change, however, if New York lawmakers pass Katie's Law. The law would give law enforcement the right to take DNA samples from anyone arrested for a violent crime.
Arrest vs. Conviction
It is important to note the difference: DNA samples would be taken from suspects following arrest, rather than conviction. This means that someone who is wrongly accused and arrested would be required to submit a DNA sample and, even if acquitted, would have his or her most personal information listed next to convicted criminals' information.
In Albany, the law was proposed by Democratic Assemblyman Joseph Morelle. Supporters of the bill include victims' rights advocates and Rochester Mayor Robert Duffy. Among those opposing the law's passage is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which campaigned against Katie's Law in other states and is voicing its opinion in New York as well.
Katie's Law is gaining traction and, if 21 other states are any indication, it will likely pass.
A Slippery Slope?
The proposed law is named for a New Mexico college student who was raped and murdered. The man guilty of the crime was later arrested for burglary, but because DNA evidence was not collected until his conviction, he was not found guilty of Katie's murder until more than three years later. Had DNA evidence been collected immediately following his arrest, the young woman's murder would have been solved much earlier.
This is the argument for Katie's Law: By collecting more DNA evidence, chances are good that law enforcement will be able to identify more individuals who are guilty of crimes.
It starts down a slippery slope, however. After that, why stop at those who have been arrested? Why not take DNA samples from every citizen? Surely, this would help law enforcement solve more crimes more quickly.
Opponents argue that the proposed law flies in the face of personal liberties as old as the country itself. Some have pointed out that the law contradicts the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. Many argue that it goes against the presumption of innocence upon which our criminal justice system is based.
Indeed, according to a Congressional study, "Courts have not fully considered legal implications of recent extensions of DNA-collection to people whom the government has arrested but not tried or convicted." According to the New York Times, criminal justice experts have spoken out against the practice, worrying that the U.S. is "becoming a genetic surveillance society."
Under Governor George Pataki, New York expanded its DNA collection to individuals convicted of even minor crimes, including misdemeanors like simple assault, meaning that now even non-felons will not only have a permanent criminal record with no chance of expungement but their DNA will remain on file, allegedly safeguarded by a government agency forever. New York's version of Katie's Law may eventually be expanded to those accused of even petty offenses like trespassing or disorderly conduct. Are traffic infractions next? Will highway patrolmen start carrying portable DNA kits for cheek swabs along with every speeding ticket? Let's hope not.
Protect Your Rights
Under New York criminal law, and across the U.S., people are considered innocent until proven guilty. Few would argue against the value of collecting DNA samples from those who have been found guilty. By allowing DNA to be taken from every person who is arrested on suspicion of a violent crime, however, New York could end up collecting DNA from thousands of innocent people.
If you have been accused of committing a violent crime, contact a New York criminal defense attorney. An experienced attorney can help you defend your rights.
Internet Blackout.
Wikipedia Opposition to Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)
January 18, 2012- Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia.org, talks about his opposition to the Stop Online Piracy Act.
January 25, 2012
Military & LAPD.
Military, LAPD to conduct more dramatic helicopter maneuvers over downtown LA.
January 25, 2012 - LOS ANGELES (CBS) — The Los Angeles Police Department teamed with military special operation forces Wednesday evening to conduct multi-agency tactical exercises in the skies above downtown LA.
Many questioned what was going on Wednesday night as a Black Hawk helicopter and four OH-6 choppers – or “Little Birds” – flew over the city, at one point hovering just above the US Bank building downtown and later flying low over the Staples Center as the Lakers played inside.
Someone could be seen sitting inside an open chopper with his legs hanging off the side.
Sky9 spotted the Black Hawk in the dark, making what appeared to be a drop off at a park before quickly ascending back into the air.
Throughout the exercise, the five rotorcrafts were staged at Dodgers Stadium.
The LAPD said the purpose of the training was in part to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments.
Chief Warrant Officer David Duran was a U.S. Army aviator for 12 years. He now flies Blackhawk helicopters for the National Guard in California. Duran says what KCAL9 saw Wednesday night could be a dry run for a future mission.
“They do a lot of mockup training,” said Duran. “But it’s always best to get the closest terrain layout to what the objective is.”
Duran said the military chooses training environments based on what they might be facing in the near future.
“If it’s a mountainous terrain, they go to the mountains; if it’s a desert terrain, they use the desert; if they’re in a coastal terrain, they use the coast,” said Duran. “If it’s an urban terrain, you know, whatever’s needed.”
In a release Monday, the LAPD said training exercises would take place at various sites around the greater Los Angeles area through Thursday. The exercises were coordinated with local authorities and owners of the training sites, according to the release.
Many wondered Thursday night about the safety of such drastic maneuvers being conducted over an urban area.
The LAPD said safety precautions were taken to prevent risk to the general public, as well as the military personnel involved.
Similar exercises have been seen in Miami and Boston.
January 27, 2012
Hal Lindsey Report.
January 28, 2012
Earthquakes.
6.2 north of New Zealand.
Military Exercises.
BREAKING: Russia Plans Military Exercises in Caucasus amid US Threats to Wage
War on Iran
Russia to launch military exercises in Armenia.
January 28, 2012 – Russia has launched large-scale preparations for Kavkaz-2012 military maneuvers, according to Nezavisimaya Gazeta.
The exercises will cover not only the territory of Southern Russia, but also that of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Armenia, with Kavkaz-2012 becoming a major event in 2012.
The plan is currently being drafted, with military preparations to involve development of training tasks in the face of a possible war against Iran, as well as other possible conflicts in the Caspian and South Caucasus region.
It is noteworthy that the maneuvers’ will be aimed at the development of modern military techniques with new automated control systems.
According to Director of the Center of Military Forecasting Anatoly Tsyganok, preparations are already under way amid the escalation of tensions in the Persian Gulf.
President Obama.
President Obama removed from Georgia ballot in 2012?
Obama has been subpoenaed by Judge Malihi to show up in court on January 26, 2012 with specific documentation to prove his eligibility to be on the Georgia ballot. Apparently, Obama doesn't feel he is required to abide by Georgia Ballot law to prove eligibility. Obama doesn't respect state law and feels he is above the law.
All states should applaud Georgia and join in the effort.
From Judge Malihi's decision:
7. Code Sections 21-2-190 to 21-2-200 set out the procedures of the presidential preference primary and also provide no exception to the Section 21-2-5 qualification requirement. This Court finds no basis under Georgia law why the qualification requirements in Section 21-2-5 would not apply to a candidate for the office of the president in the presidential preference primary.
8. Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.
Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing
'Electors, Congress, not Georgia, hold responsibility for qualifications of candidates'
Barack Obama has outlined a defense strategy for a multitude of state-level challenges to his candidacy on the 2012 presidential ballot in a Georgia case that is scheduled to come before a judge later this month – simply explain that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates.
“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argues in a motion to quash a subpoena for him to appear at the hearings Jan. 26.
“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant,” the lawyer said.
Hearings have been scheduled for that date for three separate issues to be handled. They all are raised by Georgia residents who are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot for various reasons, which they are allowed to do under state law.
It is states, usually through the office of secretary of state, that run elections, not the federal government. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the individual elections within states.
The schedule for the hearings was set by Judge Michael M. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
Three different plaintiffs’ groups are lined up for separate hearings, including one represented by California attorney Orly Taitz. She had the judge sign a subpoena for Obama’s testimony, and Michael Jablonski, Obama’s attorney for these cases, argued that he should be exempted.
Jablonski earlier had argued that state eligibility requirements didn’t apply to Obama, but the judge said that isn’t how he reads state law.
“Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this court finds that the cases cited by [Obama] are not controlling. When the court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the ‘first step … is to examine the plain statutory language,” the judge wrote. “Section 21-2-1(a) states that ‘every candidate for federal and state office’ must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary.”
In Obama’s attempt to be excused from providing testimony and evidence such as his original birth certificate, he argues that such testimony would “interrupt duties” as president.
He also argues that the documents and testimony “is, on its face, unreasonable.” And further, the documents and testimony already have been made public, he argued.
“The president made the documents available to the general public by placing it on his website. Although the document has been generally available for years, the president took the extraordinary step of acquiring a copy of the record of birth, informally known as the ‘long form,’ making it available to anyone who cares to check the website,” the filing argues.
And the state should mind its own business anyway, he argued.
“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect,” the filing explains.
Taitz’s supporters joined a discussion on her website, where she also solicits support for the expenses of the battles she’s confronting, judging that Obama is on the defensive.
“What a joke. He claims to be too busy performing the duties of the president of the United States. How many days of vacation has he taken? How many rounds of golf? If he is too busy to provide the documents that provide the basis for meeting the requirements of the office, then perhaps he better sit out the next four years,” said one.
Wrote another, “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant. … This is complete utter nonsense!”
In fact, a presidential elector in California brought a lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility at the time of the 2008 election, and was told the dispute was not yet ripe because the inauguration hadn’t taken place. The courts later ruled that the elector lost his “standing” to bring the lawsuit after the inauguration.
Those bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.
Irion said not many court observers believed Obama actually would comply with the subpoena for a number of reasons. He said for his clients’ arguments the testimony wouldn’t even be an issue.
His argument is that the Founders clearly considered a “natural born citizen,” as the Constitution requires of a president, to be the offspring of two citizen parents. Since Obama himself has written in his books that his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan, and thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, Irion argues that Obama is disqualified under any circumstances.
Those who argue against his birth in the United States note that a multitude of experts have given testimony and sworn statements that they believe Obama’s Hawaiian birth documentation to be fraudulent.
It is that concern that also has prompted Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona to turn over an investigation of that issue to his Cold Case Posse. Their investigation report is expected to be released in the next few weeks.
The Georgia hearing will be the first time among dozens of so-far unsuccessful lawsuits brought over Obama’s eligibility issue that evidence will be heard in a court. Other cases all have been dismissed over issues such as standing, without a presentation of the evidence.
Top constitutional expert Herb Titus explains that the use of “natural born citizen,” does, in fact, require parents who are citizens. That argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision
The hearing is set at 9 a.m. on Jan. 26 for the complaint brought by Weldon. Following immediately will be hearings for the cases brought by Swensson and Powell, and the issue raised by Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren and Roth will be third.
Malihi’s ruling said: “The court finds that defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
There are similar challenges to Obama’s 2012 candidacy being raised before state election or other commissions in Tennessee, Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire and other states as well.
The U.S. Supreme Court opinion cited is Minor v. Happersett from 1875. It includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
What the White House in April released was an image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama’s claim that he was born in the state. The White House has not addressed the questions raised by Obama’s father’s nationality.
The image that the new lawsuits contend is irrelevant:
An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.
“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”
If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.
“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”
War.
Is an Israeli Strike Against Iran Imminent?
January 29, 2012
Protesters.
Occupy Oakland video: Police use flashbangs & tear-gas against protesters.
January 29, 2012 - Police in Oakland, California, have used tear-gas and flash-grenades as a 2,000-strong Occupy Oakland march turned violent, with some protesters claiming that rubber bullets were also fired into the crowd. At least 300 people were arrested.
The demonstrators had attempted to take over vacant buildings to use as their headquarters, they also broke into City Hall and tried to occupy a YMCA. Police spokesman Jeff Thomason told media most of the arrests came around 8 pm local time. Police took many protesters into custody as they marched through the city's downtown area, with some entering a YMCA building.
Sue or Survive.
Lost in Litigation: Sue or Survive in America.
